The user- and traffic-orient development model in the Internet finance era is destin to be only a stage in the development of the financial industry. As the magic of “Internet +” continues to weaken. Many industries have begun to fall into a new bottleneck period after experiencing rapid development in the early stage. The financial Belarus Cell Phone Number industry is no exception. Although in the “Internet +” era, we have witness the birth of many Internet financial platforms and the participation of Internet giants. But whether entrepreneurs or Internet platforms with a certain accumulation. They have also fallen into a new round after long-term development. growth bottleneck period.
The User- and Traffic-orient Development Model.
The exhaustion of traffic advantages, the continuous decline of user activity, and the low degree of innovation of the platform model continue to plague the development of Internet financial platforms in the new stage. At the same time. Some problems caus by the blind development of Internet finance in the first half also began Belarus Cell Phone Number to appear. Problems such as platform running away and damage to users’ interests continu to appear. Which not only damag the image of Internet finance, but also contribut to the future of the Internet. The development of finance has sound the alarm. Simple user transfer does not lead to lasting development A very important point of view brought to people in the “Internet +” era dominat by traffic thinking is the concept of traffic first. However, the concept of traffic first cannot bring essential development to the industry itself.
The Exhaustion of Traffic Advantages.
If the concept of traffic first is not us effectively, it may even cause harm to the enterprise itself. Taking P2P platforms as an example. Many platforms will attract users to their platforms by means of high returns and short cycles. However, if the platform lacks a relatively stable control over the project. The returns of investors may be lost. to Belarus Cell Phone Number guarantee. When such problem projects accumulate. The investors or users themselves will still be hurt in the end. Therefore. Simple user transfer cannot bring about lasting development of the platform. Only by truly binding users and projects together can it develop better. Some people may ask. Since projects and users ne to be deeply bound to achieve longer-term development. Why are there still no problems with so many users and projects on large platforms?